A note to whoever at a frontier lab just followed this link — about the part of your business that’s costing you more than it makes.
It means standing up a compliance apparatus for every account — connectors, retrieval, guardrails, security reviews, residency, audits — and doing it again for the next one. It’s expensive, it isn’t the work you’re best at, and at the end the customer still asks the two questions you can’t fully answer:
You can’t fully fix it — it’s in the nature of the thing you built, and every grounding layer is a mitigation, not a cure. Which means the most sensitive, most regulated, highest-value data is exactly the data you can least afford to be wrong about.
There’s a version where your model never touches the records. It reads the shape of the data — the field names — and writes the question. Something sovereign holds the data, runs it, and returns the answer to the customer. Nothing leaves the building, so there’s nothing to leak. Compliance stops being an apparatus you rebuild per customer and becomes a property of the architecture.
It can’t hallucinate a record it never sees.
It is fewer tokens per data question — we published the math, and you can check it. So weigh the whole ledger:
You keep the part with the margin and the moat: the intelligence. We carry the part that’s been costing you.
The whole interface is public. And there’s a scoreboard for the one skill this needs from a model: how good is it at writing a query it can’t answer? Come be the best at it. If it fits where you’re taking the model anyway, you’ll know faster than we could tell you.
The contract and the benchmark are open. The economics are published. And if you’d rather just talk it through — so would we.
Go deeper · AI over your data · The savings · Why North Star